|
|
Post by AuTo on Jan 30, 2017 1:04:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by duplissi on Feb 9, 2017 19:01:15 GMT -5
I'll venture a post. I haven't been here in ages, but I do love me some overclocking. Firestrike: www.3dmark.com/fs/11624380Timespy: www.3dmark.com/spy/1167986Sadly I can't get my cpu over 4.5ghz, and really 4.4 if I want it 100% stable, also the 1080 just doesn't want to venture further than 2.025ghz. |
|
|
|
Post by AuTo on Feb 9, 2017 22:41:41 GMT -5
I'll venture a post. I haven't been here in ages, but I do love me some overclocking. Firestrike: www.3dmark.com/fs/11624380Timespy: www.3dmark.com/spy/1167986Sadly I can't get my cpu over 4.5ghz, and really 4.4 if I want it 100% stable, also the 1080 just doesn't want to venture further than 2.025ghz. What voltages are you pumping in? I couldn't get much more out of a 5820k either |
|
|
|
Post by duplissi on Feb 9, 2017 23:00:15 GMT -5
It's sitting at 1.344 right now. Probably about as far as I'd like to take it.
|
|
|
|
Post by AuTo on Feb 10, 2017 0:02:37 GMT -5
About It's sitting at 1.344 right now. Probably about as far as I'd like to take it. You can push it a bit more, Im running my 5930K at about 1.36, though I can drop it to 1.2 and still be stable |
|
|
|
Post by duplissi on Feb 10, 2017 14:48:12 GMT -5
You can push it a bit more, Im running my 5930K at about 1.36, though I can drop it to 1.2 and still be stable I may, but I need to clean my water loop first. Its been two years without a cleaning, and one without a flush, so it's due for one. I'd also like to try that gallium based TIM. |
|
|
|
Post by AuTo on Feb 10, 2017 18:17:19 GMT -5
You can push it a bit more, Im running my 5930K at about 1.36, though I can drop it to 1.2 and still be stable I may, but I need to clean my water loop first. Its been two years without a cleaning, and one without a flush, so it's due for one. I'd also like to try that gallium based TIM. I would not put gallium anywhere near a computer, when gallium melts, it becomes extremely reactive to other materials and will essentially eat through the waterblocks. Gallium would need its own special loop using glass and gold |
|
|
|
Post by duplissi on Feb 10, 2017 18:26:41 GMT -5
I may, but I need to clean my water loop first. Its been two years without a cleaning, and one without a flush, so it's due for one. I'd also like to try that gallium based TIM. I would not put gallium anywhere near a computer, when gallium melts, it becomes extremely reactive to other materials and will essentially eat through the waterblocks. Gallium would need its own special loop using glass and gold Works with copper (which my waterblock is), and the tin plated heat spreader. There will be no aluminum near it. lol. Edit: Apparently it's nickel, and really should only be used on de-lided cpus. Haswell-E is soldered. Guess that's out of the question. I had only heard about it recently, and was curious about it. |
|
|
|
Post by AuTo on Feb 10, 2017 18:54:58 GMT -5
I would not put gallium anywhere near a computer, when gallium melts, it becomes extremely reactive to other materials and will essentially eat through the waterblocks. Gallium would need its own special loop using glass and gold Works with copper (which my waterblock is), and the tin plated heat spreader. There will be no aluminum near it. lol. Edit: Apparently it's nickel, and really should only be used on de-lided cpus. Haswell-E is soldered. Guess that's out of the question. I had only heard about it recently, and was curious about it. Too many potential problems and ways to kill the pumps to be an effective cooling method. It would be easier to throw in LN2. I want to throw a custom loop in this PC one day, but first I want a PC that runs at 5GHz. Also try to get a valid result in 3dmark, I'll add your scores once you do |
|
|
|
Post by duplissi on Feb 11, 2017 12:05:10 GMT -5
Too many potential problems and ways to kill the pumps to be an effective cooling method. It would be easier to throw in LN2. I want to throw a custom loop in this PC one day, but first I want a PC that runs at 5GHz. Also try to get a valid result in 3dmark, I'll add your scores once you do Kill the pumps? I think you are mistaking a TIM (Thermal interface material) aka thermal paste, and the coolant in the loop. Definitely not building a loop with liquid metal in it. lol. My Firestrike score was valid, but for some reason there were "time measurment inconsistencies" with my Timespy run. My previous Timespy run was valid: www.3dmark.com/spy/1167949 |
|
|
|
Post by kionicwarlord222 on May 1, 2017 15:35:17 GMT -5
 My CPU hit my score massively LOL. Gonna have to plan a upgrade later this year.  |
|
|
|
Post by kionicwarlord222 on May 3, 2017 18:44:21 GMT -5
 52 degrees on 2000mhz folks. Great cooler they got on there. |
|
|
|
Post by kionicwarlord222 on Feb 23, 2018 20:50:32 GMT -5
  Im ballin out here AuTo how your score game lookin cuz? |
|
|
|
Post by brodyn3 on Dec 21, 2020 16:14:26 GMT -5
I would not put gallium anywhere near a computer, when gallium melts, it becomes extremely reactive to other materials and will essentially eat through the waterblocks. Gallium would need its own special loop using glass and gold Speed Test |
|
